Rogerian model of argument

Rogerian model of argument

A Rogerian argument presumes that if author and audience find common ground regarding an issue or problem, they will be more likely to find, or agree upon, a common solution. It succeeds only when the author understands the audience Background: The Rogerian Argument is a persuasive strategy based on collaboration and mutual understanding that seeks common ground, the point at which two sides can agree, rather than victory Rogerian Argument In your essay, first, introduce the problem. Acknowledge the other side before you present your side of the issue. This may take several paragraphs. Next, you should carefully present your side of the issue in a way that does not dismiss the other side

Rogerian Argument // Purdue Writing Lab

Rogerian argument is a negotiating strategy in which common goals are identified and opposing views are described as objectively as possible in an effort to establish common ground and reach an agreement. It is also known as Rogerian rhetoricRogerian argumentationRogerian persuasionand empathic listening. Whereas traditional argument focuses on winningthe Rogerian model seeks a mutually satisfactory solution, rogerian model of argument. The Rogerian model of argument was adapted from the work of American psychologist Carl Rogers by rogerian model of argument composition scholars Richard Young, Alton Becker, and Kenneth Pike in their textbook "Rhetoric: Discovery and Change" The authors of "Rhetoric: Discovery and Change" explain the process this way:.

When presenting your case and the case of the other side, the style is flexible with how you set up your information and how long you spend on each section. But you do want to be balanced—spending an inordinate amount of time on your position and only giving lip service to the other side, for example, defeats the purpose of using the Rogerian style.

The ideal format of a written Rogerian persuasion looks something like this Richard M. Coe, "Form and Substance: An Advanced Rhetoric. You use one type of rhetoric when discussing your position with people who already agree with you. To discuss your position with the opposition, you need to tone that down and break it into objective elements, so the sides can more easily see areas of common ground.

Taking the time to state the opposing side's arguments and contexts means the opposition has less reason to get defensive and stop listening to your ideas. In the s and into the early s, some debate existed about whether women should use this conflict-solving technique. Share Flipboard Email. English English Grammar An Introduction to Punctuation Writing. Richard Nordquist, rogerian model of argument.

English and Rhetoric Professor. Richard Nordquist is professor emeritus of rhetoric and English at Georgia Southern Rogerian model of argument and the author of several university-level grammar and composition textbooks. our editorial process. Updated October 01, Cite this Article Format. Nordquist, Richard. Rogerian Argument: Definition and Examples. copy citation. Watch Now: Tips to Rogerian model of argument a Great Salary. Tips on How to Write an Argumentative Essay.

Preparing an Argument Essay: Exploring Both Sides of an Issue, rogerian model of argument. What Does It Mean to Make a Claim During an Argument? Definition and Examples of an Ad Hominem Fallacy. Premise Definition and Examples in Arguments.

Rogerian Argumentation

, time: 4:45

Rogerian Model of Argument

Rogerian Argument Model (Based on Carl Rogers's studies in psychotherapy) Use the Rogerian model when your audience is hostile and non-conciliatory. This method is also known as the non-adversarial or WIN-WIN argument model Rogerian 1. Introduction of Problem: State the problem you hope to resolve. By presenting your issue as a problem you raise the possibility of positive change. Often opponents will want to solve the same problem. 2. Summary of Opposing Views: As accurately and neutrally as possible, state the views of the people with whom you blogger.com Size: 1MB Benefits to Opponent Writer lays out possible ways to compromise or alternative solutions to the problem that would benefit both reader and writer under more circumstances than either perspective alone accounts for. Writer's Position Example: (Topic) Homeschooling Concerned